Thanks for the log.
It appears that the ST4000LM024 disk partitions are being skipped
Jun 09 21:09:43 volumio-rp4-lan volumio[699]: info: Ignoring mount for partition: boot
Jun 09 21:09:43 volumio-rp4-lan volumio[699]: info: Ignoring mount for partition: volumio
Jun 09 21:09:43 volumio-rp4-lan volumio[699]: info: Ignoring mount for partition: volumio_data
Jun 09 21:09:43 volumio-rp4-lan volumio[699]: info: Ignoring mount for partition: 4TB_SMR
This can only mean that the disk is not being reported by the OS as a removable USB device. We can try to find out why this is, see below.
The check is new for Volumio 3, due to the fact that removable disks are being handled slightly different because of Debian Buster.
Reading any internal disk in the system is causing seriously performance issues (with a deadlock in some situations) with x86 installations, so this was temporarily blocked by only allowing usb disks.
It will be replaced by a future option for the user to select the disk(s) to be read, similar to the way a network share can be selected.
Could you show us the result of
lsblk -o RM,HOTPLUG
It may give us a clue why the disk is not reported as removable device.
Thanks!
The disk is not detected as a USB device (that is why Volumo skipped it) and not as removable either. HOTPLUG will not help us much, it may not safe as eSATA devices are hotplug-capable.
To be continued…
I know this is out of scope of the beta, but pass it as an observation. Generally V3 beta has worked well. I installed it because I wanted remote debugging, in VSCode, for some i2c display software I was porting from python to node.js.
Part of my software has infra-red remote control. I discovered that infra-red is now part of the kernel via gpio-ir. However, when I add dtoverlay=gpio-ir,gpio_pin=19 # for receiving data, to /boot/config.txt, my IQAudio dac+ card can’t be found by volumio. Volumio displays an red alsa error when selecting a track. Remove the line and the IQ Audio works fine again.
This on a Pi3 with 17/5 beta image.
Maybe GPIO19 is already used by your DAC? My HifiBerry DAC+ uses GPIO18…21 for it’s own signaling. I had this problem recently when selecting “spare” GPIO for a rotary encoder volume control.
I should of re-read the iq-audio docs… I have had this board for a few years, I thought I used GPIO18 before, but the documentation says it is used for i2s…so I was stamping all over the codec! When I was connecting it again… something in the back of my mind was telling me it should be connected further down the board.
On another topic the socket-io api is working fine in V3.
I’ve been trying out beta3 and the most noticeable problems are volume control slider does nothing (volume doesn’t change at all), my USB thumb drive is seen by OS but is never seen/added to my library.
running on rpi3b+ using iqaudio DAC pro. the USB stick is 64g Memorex cheapo.
Hallo… reporting the problem
I am using v3.074… with raspberry 3 model B+
using hifi AIODE Digi Pro Digital out
in i2s selector, i used to choose HifiBerry Digi+ Pro…
now in v3, everytime i choose HifiBerry Digi+ Pro, it reporting error when playing the song and the song did not play at all…
so i choose HifiBerry Digi, now it play… but all the song play in slower… it is very noticeable cause i already try some of my song collection and all of them play slower…
confirm after i using volumio v2.882, everything back to normal… i can select HifiBerry Digi+ Pro and using Hifi AIODE Digi Pro Digital out… the speed of playback also back to normal…
HI, Downloaded the latest version of the beta.
I cannot do apt-get update or install packages from repositories, like unzip.
Any idea? I also uncommented the line in sudo nano /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Hi volumio team,
thank you for this great peace of software and the work you invest!
Today I discovered a new Version 3.078 … but since several revisions the “Fixes” textbox tells me the same:
Do not scan internal drives
Multiroom Handling Backend and User interface
Temporarily removed multiroom
TIDAL Connect with alsa
Could you please give some information what was really changed between the revisions? Providing a link to the changelog in git or something similar would also be highly appreciated. (Even if I am the only one who does not find the changes in git )
Thank you & best regards,
Chris